Singapore Democrats

Home Perspective Vantage We deserve better - thoughts of a technician
We deserve better - thoughts of a technician Print Email
Monday, 28 September 2009

Amin

My name is Amin. I am a technician in my early forties, married with three school-going children. I tied the knot with my beloved Fatimah at the age of 28. My wife used to work as a clerk in a statutory board but is now my minister for domestic affairs.

We live in a four-room flat which we bought some years ago in the northern part of Singapore. I am servicing my flat installments through my CPF.

Two of our older children are in secondary school while the youngest is in primary four. I travel to my work place by motor bike to escape the hassle of travelling by feeder bus and the MRT.

I am often told, not too subtly by government and union leaders, that I should consider myself fortunate because I am still gainfully employed. Although my monthly income is about $2,000 my take home amount is less than $1,700.

Besides putting food on the table I also have to take care of other expenses, which include my children’s school expenses, utilities, transportation, etc. Occasionally we have to cope with the unexpected such as when the children fall sick.

At the end of each month we can barely make ends meet.

Life in Singapore is becoming more and more expensive. It is really tough to raise a family. My wife and I also make it a point to keep in touch with our elderly parents and chip in whatever we can to make their retirement less painful.  We pray very hard that we never have to be hospitalized because we cannot afford the expenses.

I am nonetheless supposed to be "fortunate". The frightening thing is that there are other ordinary workers who earn even less but have financial obligations no less daunting than mine.

But are we not supposed to be living in the First World and enjoying the Swiss standard of living? Every now and then we are told that Singapore is number one in something or other. Our port is the world’s busiest, SIA is the number one airline, our so-called sovereign fund is among the biggest in the world etc, etc.

I used to feel proud of these achievements. But over the last couple of years I have begun to have second thoughts. I ask myself what have these achievements got to do with me?

The fact that Changi is number one really has nothing to do with me. The fact that our reserves amount to a few hundred billions has done nothing for the average Singaporean like me. We are still ourselves and still toiling away day in and day out for an income that is not commensurate with the amount of work we put in.   

On the other hand, our ministers are the most highly paid in the world as their salaries are pegged to the country’s top earners.

Worse, we now have to compete with foreign workers who threaten our livelihood. We also have the largest number of foreign immigrants percentage wise. No ordinary worker – at least the people I know – feels secure with his or her job. Any talk of increased wages will inevitably be countered by the threat of being retrenched. 

The temptation for employers to hire cheaper foreign labour is too attractive to resist. There is absolutely no job security for us.

Should we lose our jobs we are expected to downgrade. This is what I don't understand, we are supposed to be No. 1 in this and that but we constantly face the propsect of having to downgrade.  

Worse many have to resort to begging and queueing for free food. This is our country. We have served our country in many ways. Our parents too have done their share in making Singapore what it is today. Surely we deserve better. But alas this is the real situation that exists in Singapore today.

A Government leader tried to make us believe that I as a Malay enjoy special privileges under the constitution. In fact we Malays have not received any special treatment. We identify ourselves with Singaporeans of other races and share the same hardship as all other citizens.

Unfortunately, our loyalty to Singapore has always been questioned to the extent that we have been deprived of many opportunities to serve our nation. But despite this we will join our fellow Singaporeans and put our shoulders to the wheel to build a better nation for all. 

We see little hope for a better life in Singapore unless there is a drastic change in the way this country is being run. What good can our country’s multi-billion reserves do for ordinary people like us? We are beginning to feel that the Singapore of today is only meant for the rich and powerful – many of whom are not Singaporeans.Ordinary Singaporeans like myself exist only to serve their interests.

We truly long for change. Ordinary Singaporeans deserve to be treated better in our own country.

This piece written by Mr Jufrie Mahmood is an amalgamation of several discussions with ordinary Singaporeans.

 

 

Share this article:
Facebook Technorati Stumble It! Newsvine Reddit Del.icio.us Digg This!
Comments (20)
  • sdp - Guidelines for coments
    Dear readers,

    Thank you for your continued interest in this website. While we encourage debate and discussion in our comments section, we also need to ensure that the discussions remain of an acceptable standard.

    To this end, we advise all our readers who post comments to stick to discussing the subject at hand. Some of the posts in recent discussions have not observed this netiquette. Whilst we have allowed such posts for a while it cannot go on indefinitely and without moderation. We will not continue to publish posts that do not adhere to this or other guidelines (see below).

    Of course, leeway will be given for comments that occasionally stray off topic but we do not encourage gratuitous postings that repeatedly veer off from the main story.

    Also please refrain from protracted one-to-one conversations/exchanges that do not contribute to the discussion at hand. Those who wish to repeatedly canvass a certain viewpoint are encouraged to write their own blogs. Finally, avoid profanity (generally this has not been a problem in this website).

    Thank you.

    SDP
  • NissanViP - Mr Amin & family.
    My sincere best wishes to him (Mr.Amin) and his family well.

    With regards of the malay rights, LKY has abolish such rights (almost near to extinction) for native malay in Singapore.

    I do noted that singaporean malay very patience with LKY administration in order to keep peace and harmony with other races.

    I have friends who works in Government agency told me that LKY will not allow not just to the minority advantage, but to the whole lot of singaporean unless they are filthy rich or worth millions in their bank account, regardless of their qualification and background.

    It is the money that can speak louder and will be heard and care by LKY.

    This is one many reasons why Tun Dr.Mahathir was very displeased with LKY administration.

    Tun Mahathir once emphasis that the malay should continue to maintain their right in singapura (Singapore) but LKY do not think so.

    LKY make it to the point that he owned Singapore state even though in the separation agreement, nothing was mentioned that singapore was sold to him.

    I really appreciate to the malay who continue to live peace and harmony and to keep strong racial bonding amongst us regardless of race.

    LEE KUAN YEW is the only isolated chinese causing trouble amongst us.

    Remember what he said in the parliament, "National pledge is just an Aspiration".
  • BryanT - There we go..... confusion
    Just when I had just commented that writing an op-ed in the guise of a fictitious letter is imprudent, here we already have the first reader offering his misplaced "sincere best wishes to him (Mr.Amin) and his family".... who are imaginary "amalgamated" persona concocted by Mr Jufrie.

    Perhaps Mr Jufrie would like to list down the names of those ordinary Singaporeans he spoke to, so that we can express our "best wishes" to the real people instead of fictional ones.

    [[i]afternote: there is a comment prior to this one that is still pending "moderation", unless it has been censored (again).[/i]]
  • BryanT - Op-ed or direct personal account?
    [i][please note that this post should appear before the one I have above. I apologise, it's some mix-up between myself and the censor... ermm, I mean moderator][/i]

    I was going to express my sympathy with Amin on his predicament until I realised that he is an "amalgamation", a figment of the author's invention. While we cannot preclude that what is happening to "Amin" might indeed be reality on the ground, I think it is imprudent to write an op-ed in the guise of a contribution from a fictitious person.

    I am unsure of the journalistic background of Jufrie Mahmood but I would like to quote from the "Ethics of Journalism" adopted by Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE) [RESOLUTION 1003 (1993) Para 3]:

    [b]"the basic principle of any ethical consideration of journalism is that a [u]clear distinction must be drawn between news and opinions, making it impossible to confuse them[/u]. News is information about facts and data, while opinions convey thoughts, ideas, beliefs or value judgments on the part of media companies, publishers or journalists."[/b]

    I suggest that the SDP website publishes articles that clearly differentiates between reportage and opinions it may desire to proffer. Otherwise, readers here might get confused, or alas, even be mistaken between facts, perceptions or even propaganda.

    In this case, we can't distinguish between the real words from the ordinary Singaporeans that Mr Jufrie purportedly reproduced here, as against those that are his expressed opinions.
  • seebeng - There are so many Amins in Singapore
    Ordinary Singaporeans like Mr Amin can be seen every day at temples, charity organisations, etc queuing up for free food.

    There are thousands of school-going children without pocket money so much so they had to depend on a scheme managed by the ST.

    All these are happening in our First World Singapore where the ministers are helping themselves to out-of-this world "salary". PAP MPs sit as directors in the multitude of companies set by the government as GLCs and TLCs.
  • betrayed
    BryanT, I commend on your enthusiasm in posting at SDP website. Do you also post on other forums such as P65 and PAP sites? If yes, which ones as I would like to enjoy your comments as well on those sites.
  • BryanT - What's the message?
    Jufrie uses the case of "Amin" and "Fatimah" to illustrate Singaporean families struggling to cope financially. I would not deny that such families in such predicament exists here and there is indeed a case to provide better assistance to those at the lower rungs of society.

    However, I disagree with the message that Jufrie is driving across. Instead of practical advice to offer people in such a situation, Jufrie chooses to insert typical SDP-esque messages at the end of the story as follows:

    [quote]Unfortunately, our loyalty to Singapore has always been questioned to the extent that we have been deprived of many opportunities to serve our nation. But despite this we will join our fellow Singaporeans and put our shoulders to the wheel to build a better nation for all.

    We see little hope for a better life in Singapore unless there is a drastic change in the way this country is being run. What good can our country’s multi-billion reserves do for ordinary people like us? We are beginning to feel that the Singapore of today is only meant for the rich and powerful – many of whom are not Singaporeans.Ordinary Singaporeans like myself exist only to serve their interests.[/quote]

    Let me offer a non-fictional story.

    I personally know of a couple; both were born in Msia and did not even get to finish primary school education. The man worked as a prime-mover driver in PSA, those that tow 40-footer containers, while the wife was a SBS bus-conductress, when they still had those then.

    They had five children and cramped the lot into a one-and-half room HDB flat. Life was tough, thin mattresses covered the entire floorspace every night, there were no study tables and certainly not sofas. There were lots of hand-me-down textbooks and uniforms among the children and rubber bands were used to hold up their socks. Lunch was usually left-over food from dinner the previous date.

    They were prudent and saved enough to move to a three-room flat. But financially, life was still a big strain.

    Despite their preoccupations and struggles, they understood one thing - they wanted the children to break out of the poverty chain they and their own parents were caught in. They did not want the next generation to repeat what they themselves went through. Despite their own lowly educational background, they knew the key was education.

    Without taking any welfare receipt, they worked hard enough and drove their children equally hard to make sure that all five children could enter university.

    At last, the father passed on too early to see the fruits of his labour and foresight when all five eventually graduated and found more than decent jobs. The cycle was broken.

    What SHOULD the message be to people like Amin and Fatimah?

    [[i]PS. I would be happy to resume my previous mode of replying whoever directs a post to me or comments on my postings. However, I have found it very tiresome to have to second-guess the moderator's censorious mood for the day. It is frustrating to type a reply-comment and then to have it sentenced to the cyber wasteland via the moderator's subjective and liberal usage of his "delete" button. He is also liable to accuse me personally of engaging in a "one-to-one exchange that does not contribute to the discussion at hand" as if a person can solely achieve that.[/i]]
  • ABW - Are you living in the past??
    BryanT - Thank you for your non-fictional story.

    Did you mention the mother was a SBS bus conductress?
    Which era was that? Isnt it most,if not all were going thru life likewise then?

    Amin's case in current text, 2009.
    Your story was 20years ago. Should comparision be made???
  • Jufrie
    Let it be known to ByranT and whoever having any doubt that the piece I wrote was certainly a non fiction. If you wish we can always meet and I shall introduce you to Amin and Fatimah.

    I do not deny the existence of families who struggled in earlier days - and even today - the sacrifices they make, to bring up their children and break out of the cycle. I am sure Amin and Fatimah are also doing their best for their children.

    But families cited by ByranT did not have to compete with foreigners, like Amin has to now.

    The thrust of my write up is that Singaporeans deserve a better deal and should be treated equally, irrespective of race or station in life.
  • SinisterMinister
    Fiction or non-fiction, no one here needs to know names to know that people are struggling. I am smart enough to see it and know it as do almost all of us.

    Furthermore, common sense would tell me people in financial hardships do not appreciate their names all over here, anywhere, and especially the straits times because of the rhetoric that will soon follow. Why would anyone want to post names when their children will be thrust in the spotlight.

    SDP, Jufrie, like I said earlier, sometimes you just need to throw the rubbish fish back in the ocean.
    *snip*

    There is no need to fulfill a selfish and self centered request. There is no need to offer a platform when common sense and decency tells us that there is no need to put this family or any other out in the open. If they want to come out in the open, they can do so on their own accord--not because someone wants to know who they are as "proof." Offering them anonymity serves an absolute purpose to create an awareness without the fallout.

    If anyone takes issue with needing names as proof, then hit the pavement and do your daily good deeds. At the end of the day, what is more important, knowing who you helped, or knowing that whom you helped helps yourself to be a better being.
  • BryanT - Demagoguery or constructive solutioning
    Every generation of people around the world, not just in Singapore, has its set of challenges.

    As I was driving yesterday and happened to tune in to BBC World Service during a report about the Celtic Tiger - Ireland. Among the dismal economic data, employment has apparently jumped to 14% from virtually zero previously. Now that is a societal challenge. But I digress.

    Singaporeans has faced many challenges over the past decades - housing, health, school places, communalism, communism, unemployment (vis Brit withdrawal),Confrontation, race and union riots and what not in non-chronological order. I am sure at that time, many people faced with these issues thought they "deserved better" and more could be done to make their lives better, and done faster. People of different political persuasions (communists, communalists or socialists) and financial and social backgrounds also wanted to be treated equally.

    Successively, and arguably also successfully, the country, comprising the government and people, have overcome most of these issues. Sometimes through sheer determination, on other times in silly roundabout ways, while on other occasions, they just petered out.

    Today's Singapore is obviously not devoid of its set of challenges. Time has indeed changed, and we no longer find bus conductresses on our buses. The Msia-born parents who were PRs have gladly assumed citizenship and given birth to new sets of citizens. Yes, cost of living especially for the lower rungs of society, social and employment issues arising from foreign worker policies, et al. The problems may different from previous ones, but since when have the challenges ever been the same?

    No, I am not talking about taking an ostrich-like head-in-the-hole approach - being complacent and letting the problem unravel by themselves. And I am certainly not saying that solutions of the past will fit those of the present. What i am more concerned is the right message to the people, especially those who are disadvantaged.

    [b]Demagogic statements[/b] that "Singapore of today is only meant for the rich and powerful", or questioning what "multi-billion reserves can do for ordinary people" are NOT the message. They play solely on the [b]politics of envy and are the epitome of blame-shifting[/b]. They do not serve the constructive function of finding solutions for everyone, including the underprivileged themselves.

    [[i]PS. *snip* *snip*. Initially I thought the snipping sound was the infamous censor-cum-moderator frantically in action, but actually it's the forlorn fisherman tangled up with his fishing lines, hooks and rubber fishes. I suppose sub-par fishermen attract the unsavoury rubbery fishes and alas, the latter do bounce (back) to haunt the odd luckless fishermen. But we best leave him to his own devices.... ermm I mean fishing-rod plus his entangled mess.[/i]]

    [afternote: my reply to seebeng's post below is pending moderation aka censorship board clearance]
  • seebeng - Is BryanT real?
    Since Mr Jufrie has stated categorically that Mr Amin is not a "fictitious person" as claimed by BryanT, it's only proper now for BryanT to accept the invitation from the writer to meet up with the real Mr Amin.

    If BryanT is not going to respond to Mr Jufrie's offer then the question is whether BryanT himself/herself is a "fictitious person"?

    Is BryanT a PAP-created cyber prowler?
  • G_Chen - re: What's the message?
    [quote=BryanT]
    Let me offer a non-fictional story.[/quote]

    BryanT, what prove have got to imply that Jufrie's account is "fictional"? If you have none, then it is only right that you should apologise to Jufrie for having made such allegation. Btw, I have still not come across any current or past submission from you on P65 Blog.
  • BryanT - A reply via moderator to seebeng
    Since there is a direct question from seebeng, albeit off-topic, I would like to seek moderator's permission to reply him that my point was not whether Amin was real. Mr Jufrie himself stated in the article's footnote that it was based on conversations with several Singaporeans - so the article was not fully about Amin.

    With moderator's permission, I would have wanted to remind him to read my first posts properly and note that my point and objection was that Jufrie should not write an op-ed in the guise of a personal article.

    People will get confused as to what are facts he was reporting and opinions he was expressing. I dare venture to say I suspect that the latter was included in the article.

    My fictitiousness or reality is not relevant, although I am sure the moderator can vouch for the latter.
  • g_e - The meek shall NOT inherit the earth.
    I fail to see what you're getting so worked up about, Brayin'T. What's with all this 'op-ed' nonsense and high indignation over how the SDP chooses to run its website? Does the SDP owe you a living? Quit the shameful whining. Can't stand the bloody heat, get out of the damned kitchen. It seems to me that you've been indulged with more than enough rope to hang yourself several times over already.

    In case you hadn't noticed, thanks to PAP oppression this isn't allowed to be a proper daily newspaper that I can buy at my local newsagent to read over breakfast, it's a website. An op-ed is a newspaper article that expresses the opinions of a named writer who is usually unaffiliated with the newspaper's editorial board. So Jufrie's article is certainly no op-ed since it fails the criteria.

    I had no problem understanding that his story was an extended metaphor, an allegory of the endless pain that poorly paid Singaporeans are suffering right this very minute. It hurt, it resonated, unlike your contrived tale of the SBC (you sure it wasn't STC?) conductress. That Amin's agony is being deliberately and callously inflicted by the madmen whom we cannot get rid of, blood-sucking creatures who now resemble a terminal end-stage cancer, was immediately obvious.

    I got all of that. I pictured 5 million sardines crammed into a tiny 700 sq. km island, fighting with each other to survive like lab rats in some crazed scientist's experiment - didn't you?
  • Robox - Barking Up The Wrong Tree
    My first job after I graduated from university was as editor of a magazine. Despite the fact that it was only a 4-month stint, I had to undergo all the initial training and study for editors. This discussion reminds me of one of those topics in the training: [b]story genres[/b], of which there are quite a few. I’ll try to recall as many of them as I can before I arrive at my point:

    1. [b]News[/b] stories, which don’t need explanation;

    2. [b]Op-ed[/b] pieces, which also don’t need explanation;

    3. [b]Reviews[/b], which are also opinions pieces but usually refer to those written about books and other literary sources, artistic endeavors such as theathre and movies – even documentary films, which don’t belong under the descriptor of artistic are reviewed;

    4. [b]Human interest[/b] stories, typically of tragedies – but not confined to them – and their impact on the affected humans;

    5. [b]Profiles[/b], which are usually personality profiles but can also be extended to profiles of entities such as organizations and events;

    The above 5 genres tend to dominate newspapers; those below are more frequently found in other publications such as magazines, blogs etc.

    6. Biographies, which can include auto-, semi- and quasi-biographies;

    7. Testimonials, which are stories like the letter published here by the 15-year old Anglican High student, as well as the open letter written by Madam Hwang to Shafie’s mum – both were published many months ago;

    8. Narratives and other creative writing pieces such as poetry, which are usually found only in magazines;

    9. Hybrids;

    10. And others that I may have left out.

    The above story belongs firmly in the [b]“profiles”[/b] genre, but this time it is a [b]composite profile[/b] of eight individuals Mr. Jufrie Mahmood spoke to whose lives had enough common threads to it that it could be the story of the Everyman in similar circumstances.

    How very scandalous!

    This is not the most common “profile” story but it has been done before and requires more skills than ordinary profile stories because of the compilation, coherence and believability required in this type of “profile” story.

    [b]What journalistic standards are we then to hold an unpaid, non-journalist (I’m assuming) like Mr Jufrie Mahmood who has no membership to any professional body of journalists?[/b]

    Mr Jufrie Mahmood has performed the following tasks in his article:

    1. Issued the disclaimer that this is a story of eight individual Singaporeans whose lives are so similar that it could be told as a composite - that’s the honesty he felt he owed readers;

    2. Employed a rarely used literary device, but as a political tool – it’s what politicians do, and I’m sure the intention is to discover if there may other Amins and Fatimahs reading this who could relate to this story and speak up. (Unfortunately, Singaporeans are a highly reticent lot when it comes to personal information, but there is no harm trying as they may eventually open up after sufficient exposure to such tools – aggregating his political constituency’s interest are the most important function of a politician.)

    [b]Did he do any fact checking?[/b]

    In professional journalism [b]the person/s being interviewed for a profile[/b] - just as it is with biographies, testimonials, some types/portions of human interest stories - [b]provides the facts for the story[/b]; [b]they are the authority on their personal information and are trusted to give the correct information about themselves and their lives.[/b]

    Is there any reason to suspect that the facts provided may not be true? I suspect some of the comments here are more indicative of the hypersuspiciousness that is so prevalent in Singapore’s fascist Establishment.

    Isn’t this story common enough and believable enough just based on the facts already published in the story? Are the difficulties faced by a man earning $2000/month, with a stay-at-home wife and three children, and parents and in-laws to support occasionally so difficult to imagine?

    [b]Is Mr Jufrie Mahmood obliged to fact check given all I have said above?[/b]

    Well, only if he needs to - such as in cases of possible liability - and to increase his credibility as an [b]unpaid non-journalist politician[/b]. Fact checking would definitely have been possible if Mr Jufrie decided to intrude into their most personal spaces by tailing them around them around 24/7 to determine if they are telling the truth.

    Ah, the endless ethical dilemmas of a journalist…
  • Seelan Palay
    Hey BryanT, why not you take up Jufrie's offer to meet him up so that he can show you Mr Amin and Fatimah?
  • AN
    Hi Robox,

    Wow! That's a great piece of analysis from a journalist perspective. If only you own a media company or that you are the Chairman of SPH, then we (commoners), won't be reading Shitty Times (145th ranking)trash all this while!

    I won't retract what I said about you earlier in my other post. I am all for such talented person like you to be given the opportunity to run our tiny red dot, or contribute to our nation survival.

    Not the kind of system currently run by PAP. Its all flawed and only benefit the rich. I believe with Team SDP and more like-minded persons who supports SDP causes, things will be brighter in our country.

    Again, let me reiterate, its an excellent piece of journalistic professionalism. Thanks Robox and keep your invaluable comments coming. Cheers.
  • tewniaseng
    Whether real or fiction, there are many singaporeans worse than Amin.Their take home pay is less than his $1700, and have to support children and parents.While our country is number 1 in many areas, but our people suffer, due to high cost of living. The only way pap govt can help us is to lower down the cost.If the govt can do it, then I will vote for pap,
  • AnnA - BryanT
    Based on your non-fict story :

    "At last, the father passed on too early to see the fruits of his labour and foresight when all five eventually graduated and found more than decent jobs. The cycle was broken."

    The granpas and grandmas of his age were also as hopeful as he was during those days but too bad... this is 2009...

    If he were to live on, he might be very disappointed seeing most people of his age are picking up cans and cartons currently. (They might have been as hardworking as he was too)
Please login or register to post your comments.
 

Act Now

Support Democracy!
Please Donate
Read:The party that stands up for you
More options to donate
 

SDP Publictaions

Magazine Support SDP , buy our 30th Anniversary Magazine here

minsal
pdf
link

 

Danny the Democracy Bear

Now available online here!

 
Singapore Democrats on Facebook
Banner
Banner

Awesome Words

Compromise used to mean that half a loaf was better than no bread. Among modern statesmen, it really seems to mean that half a loaf is better than a whole loaf.

G K Chesterton
Banner

News feeds

Singapore Democrat News
Joomla Templates by JoomlaShack