Singapore Democrats

Home Perspective Special Feature The Singapore that we aspire to build
The Singapore that we aspire to build Print Email
Monday, 01 June 2009

Jufrie Mahmood

My youngest son, Khairul Azrie, is in Secondary 3. Like his brother Khairul Anwar he too represents his school in basketball. It is a known fact that most Malay boys their age either play soccer or sepak takraw.

When time permits my wife and I would make it a point to watch them play in the numerous inter school and inter district tournaments, especially if the games are played at the Aljunied Basketball Centre, which is a stone’s throw away from where we live. And we are proud to say that when they are on the court they play their hearts out, making meaningful contributions to their teams.

My sons’ choice of sport has given them an exposure that is somewhat different from what we normally see. The friends that they go around with are almost entirely non-Malay. Come Hari Raya their friends would converge on our house to savour the ketupat and rendang prepared by my wife. The dessert has always been the traditional kueh normally served during Hari Raya. To many of them the food was so finger-licking good that they would tease my wife to let them come for makan more often than just once a year.

What my children are going through reminds me of my childhood days at the government quarters in Haig Road where I grew up. It was a multiracial setting in every sense of the word where everyone was oblivious of their racial background. We were completely colour blind. Whether you are Chinese, Malay, Indian or Eurasian it made no difference at all. We had Ali as well as Ah Lee, the Kanagasabai children and the Pereiras.

Even the hawkers in their tricycles and pushcarts were multiracial. The ‘chi chong fan’ lady and uncle Karupayah, the kacang putih man would take turns making their rounds. Soon after came Ah Heng, with his ice kacang ball, to be followed by Wak Karto plying his mee rebus and tahu goreng. Not to be left out was Mama Maideen with his famous mee.

All of them could speak bahasa Melayu, our so-called Bahasa Kebangsaan. Once a week we were treated to a movie at the open field in Kulim Place where the GSWO (Government Servants Welfare Organisation) club house was also situated. Those were the wonderful days, gone forever.

Though the environment we find ourselves in today is vastly different from the one that I grew up in I am nonetheless happy to see my children coping well with their circle of friends. Last weekend however, when we were just about to finish our dinner Azrie suddenly asked me whether it is true that as a Malay he would not be allowed to join his friends should they opt to serve in the air force. What about the army or navy? He further said, without being asked, that he learned this from his friends in school.

On hearing what his brother said, Khairul Anwar chipped in and said that he too had heard about this. His teacher had told the students in a class discussion that since he is a Malay he would not be called upon to serve his nation in the services mentioned above because "Singapore is surrounded by Malay countries."

"What’s wrong with that, papa? Are they not countries friendly to us?" They are also our major trading partners and members of the ASEAN family, he continued.

I took a deep breath, told him and his two siblings (my eldest child, a girl, studies at Temasek Polytechnic) to finish their dinner, help their mama to clear the table and move to the living room.

I had planned to discuss this issue with my children sometime in the future when they are more mature. I did not want to disrupt their growing up years. But when this very subject of racial discrimination was brought up by my children themselves I had no choice but to bring forward the process of politically educating them.

I related to them some of the more pertinent points of disagreement serious-minded opposition personalities are having with the PAP Government. As for me I have said all my life that I had stood for multiracialism.

The PAP also claims to adhere to the concept of multiracialism. When Singapore was a part of Malaysia its leaders pushed for a "Malaysian Malaysia" so aggressively that the Malays got very irritated. They feared that the concept pushed by the PAP would deny them their special rights, as enshrined in the constitution. Its actions infuriated the Malaysians to such an extent the Tunku, Malaysia’s Prime Minister at that time, was left with no other choice but to expel Singapore from the federation.

Not long after attaining independence the PAP put into practice discriminatory policies which they were so dead against when Singapore was in Malaysia. And make no mistake about it, such policies cannot be justified no matter how the Government tries to rationalize them.

One explanation put forward by the PAP is that they did not want the Malays to face a dilemma should a war break out between Singapore and its neighbours. So, to "save" them from this so-called dilemma it is best that they did not be put in such a situation. To do this they must not be allowed to serve in the armed forces, especially in the air and naval forces.

I related to them an article entitled The Ghosts That Walk With Us written by the late Mr S Rajaratnam in which he concluded that the chances of Singapore going to war with its immediate neighbours were real. Under such circumstances the Malays in Singapore would not want to fight, thus justifying the discriminatory policies.

This perhaps explains the absence of Malays in the air force and the navy and their preponderance in the civil defence and to a lesser extent, the police force. How wrong can the PAP be? This is certainly not the way to build a united nation. Perhaps Singaporeans need to be reminded that during Indonesia’s konfrontasi  when then President Sukarno sent his commandoes to infiltrate our country, our soldiers in the 1st and 2nd SIR Battalion, almost entirely Malay, proudly defended their country against the Indonesian intruders. Quite a number of them got killed in the process.

Unlike the colour-blind environment in which I grew up, every turn we make nowadays we are reminded of our racial origin. We can’t, for instance, move into any housing estate of our choice due to the racial quota and you inevitably are reminded of your racial origin.

We cannot enroll in SAP schools unless we take Chinese as a second language; we go to CDAC or SINDA they tell us to go to MENDAKI.

We cannot serve in many fields in the armed forces although many foreigners-turned-Singaporeans can. For that matter, as a contractor, we are not allowed into military compounds even to cut grass or do pest control work.

We are not allowed to wear something as basic as the tudung (head scarf) when our young women reach puberty in secondary school even though religious freedom is guaranteed in the Constitution.

We cannot have more than one full minister as the quota has always been only one and that too is almost always a ministry in charge of clearing garbage. If we choose to stand for elections we have to prove our racial origin and first be issued with a certificate even though our NRIC clearly identifies us by race.

The funniest thing about this requirement is that for repeat candidates you still have to do it at every election as though in the short span of time between GEs our race undergoes a change.

This is the kind of discrimination and humiliation that the ethnic minority groups in Singapore have to live with. On one occasion a member of the approving panel was an Arab and it took an Arab to tell a Malay that he was a Malay and therefore qualified him to stand in the GRC. There are, of course, many other instances that keep reminding Singaporeans of their racial origins.

But I continue to have faith that there are enough Singaporeans of all races who oppose such discriminatory policies. Sooner, if not later, such policies will be dismantled and Singapore will be a truly multiracial society, a society that we aspire to.

I have gone into politics to oppose PAP’s hegemony, and to strive to give Singaporeans an alternative voice. I do not subscribe to the thinking that the PAP has a monopoly of ideas that are good for the nation. I believe in the establishment of a multiracial, democratic Singapore in the true sense of the word. PAP’s discriminatory policies have no place in a truly democratic Singapore.

To the PAP, any group that poses a serious challenge to its rule is labeled either a communist, a communalist or a religious extremist. And it never fails to play the racial card whenever it suits its purpose. That was how they robbed the Workers' Party team in 1991, of which I was a member, in the Eunos GRC of victory by accusing me of mixing religion with politics. The "sin" was my usage of two very common Islamic expressions of "insya Allah" and "Alhamdullah" (God willing). That, in short, is how the PAP operates and with the media under its absolute control it gets away with everything.

Apart from racial discrimination, I told my children there is a long list of other issues and policies which my comrades in the SDP and I oppose and strive to change. I intend to register in their minds the unfair tactics employed by the PAP in order to stay in power. I told them I shall be going through with them the issues in small doses so as not to overload their minds.

We in the opposition staunchly believe that it is in Singapore’s long term interest to have at least an alternative group of dedicated Singaporeans which can challenge the PAP and be ready to take on a leadership role should the PAP falter further, lose control and quickly degenerate into an unworthy outfit. I do not believe in putting all our eggs into the PAP basket. It is suicidal.

This after dinner session marked the beginning of my children’s political education.

Jufrie Mahmood is a veteran oppositionist. He stood as a candidate in the 1988, 1991, and 1997 general elections. 

 

Share this article:
Facebook Technorati Stumble It! Newsvine Reddit Del.icio.us Digg This!
Comments (19)
  • seebeng - great write-up
    Very good write-up Jufrie. I too grew up in a kampong and I know what you're trying to say.

    Let's strive towards creating a society based on meritocracy.
  • VP - Only your own sentiments?
    What you are saying is history, about kampong life and so on.

    The present is different.

    And your sentiments are probably only your own.

    But are these feelings also shared by others?
  • maxchew
    Excellent readable piece and well-written, Jufrie!
    I agree with most of your sentiments.
    Please continue to contribute pieces like this for the edification of S'poreans.
    We need people like you to lead us to the uncertain future created by our corrupt PAP leadership!
  • Dick - To VP
    At least he is sharing, you may have different experience to share, for example if you are a gay,I'm sure you have many experience on discrimination to share with us, I may not share or understand your gay feelings but nevertheless, sharing is good.
  • Sylvester Lim
    Dear Jufrie,

    Thank you for the great article as it reflects my sentiments as well of a society where race is not an issue. Despite the rhetorics of the PAPies and the old LKY, his clouded mind of the past has turned many in Singapore into intolerant people with third world personalities and narrow-mindedness. With the strict control of the MSM, I feel changes for Singapore to really progress into a true first world country will take even longer.
  • spectrum
    I thought it was an excellent write-up. However, I thought that it was a revisiting of old issues employed through an even older narrative. Although the present may or may not be different, is certainly true that the issues raised here would only strike home to the hearts of our minority friends here.

    I think the way to move forward is not to complain or squabble. Instead the thing to do would be to raise up credible minority opposition candidates to stand and to serve. I think Jufrie as a veteran is well-poised to take on a role such as that of a mentor. In such a way, Jufrie's invaluable years of experience will not go to waste.
  • Muhammad Shamin - To spectrum
    I wonder if these are really old issues. The discrimination of Malays/Muslims is something that still goes on in the armed forces. Till now, you do not find them in the Navy and the Air Force (although there are like bits and pieces in there). The tudung is still not allowed in schools.

    It will take a Non-malay from the SDP or other Opposition perhaps to champion these issues (in regards to minority concerns) to sway the Malay/Muslim votes away from PAP (due to PAPs stranglehold influence in Malay/Muslim grassroots organisation). Just like Anwar do in Malaysia in regards to the Chinese and Indian minority.
  • Seelan Palay
    Great article Jufrie, I appreciated it a lot.
  • Justin - Harsh Realities
    I'm a Reform Party member and a recent NUS Political Science grad. Well done Uncle Jufrie for a readable and insightful piece.

    But we do have the harder edge to the story as usual. The harsh realities are: for every step that the Malays in Sg has made, the other races have moved ahead in multiple strides. And none other than the PAP has admitted this, even Malay MPs. Uncle Jufrie knows that as well as anyone does.

    Just sharing a thought. I would like to meet the venerable Uncle pretty soon in person, maybe at the RP weekly Open House (see website). Everybody's welcome as well.

    Hope I have not offended anyone by insisting on getting to the bottom of things rather than leave them at the glib level. And I speak as one who has just gone through the state education system. Uncle Jufrie's tone and substance do not jive with my experience.
  • seebeng - It's disgusting
    It's disgusting to hear that some people are trying to dismiss this as an old issue.

    The issue of "minority discrimination" in a multiracial, meritocratic Singapore is real and that's why it's still being raised. As long as the issue remains unresolved, it will keep surfacing.

    The architect of existing racist policy in Singapore is none other than Lau Lee.

    Let's hope that his passing away will bring about a truly Singaporean Singapore, a Singapore where every citizen can feel proud to contribute towards nation building.
  • jasuonemillion - Get Up To Speed Jufrie
    seebeng:
    When someone says they are old issues it does not mean they are not problems anymore.

    Just like what's happening in Malaysia.
    The failure of the New Economic Policy(NEP) after decades raises the old issues of the backwardness of the bumiputras. And the question of multiracialism of pre independence days is still bugging Malaysia. Maybe, even never more so with the failure of the NEP ...making old Malaysian political issues ongoing time bombs that refuse to be defused.

    SPECTRUM has been most diplomatic and courteous to say "the way to move forward is not to complain or squabble. Instead the thing to do would be to raise up credible minority opposition candidates to stand and to serve. I think Jufrie as a veteran is well-poised to take on a role such as that of a mentor."

    SPECTRUM has been extremely kind not to dwell into Jufrie's well known preference for glib grandstanding over the years. Long on attractive but empty (sometimes rash) speeches but short on behind-the-scenes planning and brainstorming. The facts on the ground speak for themselves and Jufrie knows he has driven his political journey to a cul-de-sac of his own making. When will he get out of it to be truly a much needed role model for the younger oppo leaders across the races and parties?
  • sabrinalew - Malay Problem
    The Malay problem should not be trivialised. Least of all by Uncle Jufrie.
  • spectrum - a reply to shamin and seebeng
    I have been misunderstood when I said "old issues". I do not mean to say that the issues that Jufrie has raised are irrelevant or have been resolved. This point is of exceeding importance and is not to be taken lightly. I had meant to point out that there are newer, more pressing (and as yet unresolved issues) at stake which have to be addressed with greater priority.

    Take the digital divide for example. It is far more important for our Malay friends to close in on this gap rather than to harp about how the SAF doesn't afford them equal opportunities, or how their rights to the land at Kampong Glam land had been usurped by the government etc etc.. These are what I call "old issues", although unresolved.

    I agree that the multi-racialism and meritocracy that the establishment plays up is no more than a veneer and has to be addressed. However, the PAP has had its fair share of success in entrenching the illusion of "social mobility" in the minds of our people through its policies. It is a fact that this needs to be undone, but with attention first paid to the issues which require proactive resistance the most, ie. the new issues.
  • Omega Lee - "Chinese" incompetence
    Funny how some posters are so quick to paint a portrait of how Malays are so backward etc. when there are many examples of Chinese uncles and aunties who cant even use a computer. If I am not mistaken, wasn't it a "Chinese" lady who lost BILLIONS due to incompetence and wasn't it a "Chinese" minister who lost a would-be terrorist in custody? As corrupt and inept as the Malaysian government is, I doubt they have reached the new heights of incompetence achieved by the current government. It is this government's last line of defence: to play the racial card and rally around the idiot leader just because he happens to be the same skin color.
  • Muhammad Shamin - To spectrum
    I am not a Malay, but I think these old issues are grieviences that have long existed and will continue to exist until we as Singaporeans really embrace multi-racialism in its true meaning (which in my humble opinion will not happen under PAP) and not habor a discreet suspicion that a certain race will betray this nation in the event of a conflict.
  • AnnA - Justin
    "The harsh realities are: for every step that the Malays in Sg has made, the other races have moved ahead in multiple strides. And none other than the PAP has admitted this, even Malay MPs."

    Justin... you still don't get it, do you?

    That's the thing lah...

    I think you better ponder properly.
  • AnnA - Let Me Tell You All This
    This is as stupid as PAP's reason.

    Everybody shouldn't be in Air Force or Navy, not only Malay.

    If a stupid reason that Singapore Malays will not fight for their country just because another Malay from another country attack us, what about if China attack us? Wouldn't the Chinese hesitate to counter them? How about the Indian? Won't they also have dilemma if India decide to attack us?

    How?

    If anyone wants to say it won't happen.. then, we should remind ourselves that many foreign workers from China and India has been mistreated......... what say you??!!!
  • Social Escort - Pol Consciousness
    Agree Omega
    Jasuonemillion in another thread put what you are saying very nicely in his own way about "False Political Consciousness".

    He echoes Anwar Ibrahim who has said many times that ultimately its only democracy that is going to make things better and fairer, giving people a chance to develop their own political consciousness that is relevant to their situation.

    The PAP is really creating a mess, aggravating the vicious cycle of poverty by not allowing people to appreciate pol self help. As a result minority leaders both in govt and opposition have little option but to espouse and promote the wrong values of the middle class of the majority race.These are held up as symbols of success even by parents of kids of the minorities. Very serious problem.
  • g_e - Divide and rule.
    In my experience, both Malaysia & Singapore were far more race and colour blind when the British ruled. Power was theirs to wield, they kept the lion's share, the rest divided what was left and lived in relative peace. It seems an axiom that whenever political power is devolved into the hands of a group, we can expect it to press home its advantage to the detriment of the rest. Only a handful of enlightened countries actually manage to practise what they preach with their well-intentioned laws of non-discrimination and Singapore certainly isn't one of these.

    Jufrie's recounting of the different races at ease with one another is poignant and perfectly accurate. I remember a kinder, gentler Malaya and Singapore too, and I'm not Malay. Unfortunately the sowing of interracial discord is one of the favoured tools of the unscrupulous politician hoping to ride that particular demon to a fortune and you need only glance at African genocidal regimes for proof. Heaven knows we have plenty of those types on both sides of the causeway as well.

    Dr Kua Kia Soong's new book, [i]'May 13: Declassified Documents on the Malaysian Riots of 1969'[/i] explains only too clearly the role played by the UMNO right-wing in fomenting racial chaos to dethrone Tengku Abdul Rahman. On this side, there are also ugly suspicions about the credibility of the rioting we witnessed.

    Whatever the truth, the desired political outcome was achieved: [u]divide and conquer[/u]. The PAP continues that cynical exercise today for obvious electoral advantage. Bogeymen, after all, are a politician's best friend. Since it is to their advantage that the races continue to eye each other with suspicion, notwithstanding the sanctimonius anti-racist chest-beating and the even more pious GRC nostrum, nothing will change till they are replaced with a more enlightened bunch.
Please login or register to post your comments.
 

Act Now

Support Democracy!
Please Donate
Read:The party that stands up for you
More options to donate
 

SDP Publictaions

Magazine Support SDP , buy our 30th Anniversary Magazine here

minsal
pdf
link

 

Danny the Democracy Bear

Now available online here!

 
Singapore Democrats on Facebook
Banner
Banner

Awesome Words

Human history begins with man's act of disobedience which is at the very same time the beginning of his freedom and development of his reason.

Erich Fromm
Banner

News feeds

Singapore Democrat News
Joomla Templates by JoomlaShack