Singapore Democrats

Awesome Words

Almost everything you do will seem insignificant, but it is important that you do it.

Mahatma Gandhi

Your SDP Forum

forum-sepia.jpg
Join the online policy discussion II
1. The Economic System
2. Social Security and the CPF
3. Healthcare
4. Kopitiam
 

Tak boleh tahan!

dancing-ministers.jpg
 

Singapore's #1 political website

no1_website.png
 

Friends of SDP

 
Banner
Banner
Banner
Home News Singapore The party that cannot be named
The party that cannot be named PDF Print E-mail
Monday, 30 June 2008

Singapore Democrats

Can Singapore thrive when Mr Lee Kuan Yew is "absent"? This was what one delegate from Bangladesh wanted to know during the World Cities Summit held in Singapore last week.

This delegate probably didn't have a very high regard for the other 2,999,999 Singaporeans. In any event, it was one of those sweet questions lobbed at just the right height for Mr Lee to, to use a baseball analogy, hit it out of the park.


Appropriately cued, the Minister Mentor let rip: In the unfortunate event that if a bunch of itchy-fingered loonies who didn't know how to put the cross in the right box even if their lives depended on it voted the opposition – and not just the opposition but a "vociferous" one – into power, Singapore would go to the dogs.

No prizes for guessing who the Vociferous One is. These days Mr Lee just cannot bring himself to utter the three letters S, D, and P. That's just as well. What would really worry us is when the MM starts praising us for being "constructive."

The Lee system, according to Lee, will only survive if we are led by able leaders who are willing to make tough decisions when called upon, leaders who, by the way, have not gotten rich over the years.

He was, of course, referring to his Ministers. Yes, the same ones who jacked up their salaries by only 85 percent last year, who were tough enough to fire junior officers following the security meltdown that allowed a terrorist suspect to do a David Copperfield and able enough to pin the blame on citizens for their complacency.

Yep, the same ones who also blamed the people of being negligent over a screw-up at Changi Airport's immigration that allowed a traveler to travel under someone else's passport.

Undoubtedly a tough act to follow.

The very ones who tell Singaporeans that their retirement savings are going to be withheld because retirees can't be trusted with their own money.

The self-same Ministers who came up with the fantastic idea to set up ERPs to extract yet more money from motorists rushing home to be with their families after a long day at work.

The same ones who stumbled upon the brilliant scheme to increase the GST to help the poor and then, to their utter amazement, find homelessness increasing and long queues for free food at temples getting longer.

So tough are these talented ones that they turn the installing of lifts that will stop on every floor so that the elderly will not have to climb stairs into an election issue.

So able are they that they have nurtured a generation of citizens who can't wait to emigrate and then replace these "quitters" with new citizens from other countries who are waiting to do the same.

A party of the future

The worst part is that these Ministers belong to a political party that continues to depend on an 84-year-old to be their standard bearer. They profess no (much-needed) fresh ideas of their own to take Singapore into the future, a future where creative and bold responses are needed to meet complex challenges.

They have not the wherewithal to tell Mr Lee that he needs to take a backseat because the more he pokes his nose in, the more he is going to prevent the country from moving forward. They have to stop being head-nodders and resist being enthralled by a leader who doesn't want to retire.

At the end of the day, the PAP is still Lee Kuan Yew and Lee Kuan Yew is still the PAP. His/its modus operandi is to continue to instill fear in the populace and then extract wealth from it. Does all this sound like a party of the future?

Contrast this with another political party whose name the MM will not speak. We, the Singapore Democrats, are ready to take the country forward arm-in-arm with our fellow citizens. We are ready to lead with persuasion, not coercion.

Over the next several months, we intend to work on an alternative set of policies to present to Singaporeans in preparation for the next general elections. We will do this by conducting a series of policy discussions with our fellow Singaporeans to solicit their input.

We believe that all Singaporeans have a stake in the future of this country and that views from the ground up make the best policies. It is only by going back to the people and genuinely consulting them on what is best for our nation's future will Singapore have a future.

It is a democratic system, one where the government of the day is unafraid to consult and listen to the people while maintaining the ability to act decisively, that will make Singapore a better place for its citizens.

But how will such a system come about when the PAP is hell-bent on maintaining its absolute grip on power? The best and the only way is to build up a caring – and vociferous – opposition.
Comments
Add New Search RSS
Man In The Mirror  -  Great idea.    Tue, 01 Jul 2008 8:27 am
A consultative style is a great idea to get participation which then leads to common identity.

I suppose people are keen but this website often times cannot cope with the volume of viewers. To update the population on a timely basis, this website traffic capacity issue needs to be addressed by SDP.

As for getting public inputs for SDP policy model, I shall be keen to participate and shall urge others to contribute constructively.

Let's look forward to the topic areas of discussion from SDP then.
Yoong Kheong  -  Experience in governing also key to wonderful futu     Tue, 01 Jul 2008 10:02 am
Being vociferous can only garner popular vote. Being caring can add a personal touch to governance.

However I do believe that experience counts too. We need leaders who have the capability to react under pressure and come up with innovative and practical ideas.

Local opposition should work towards forming their own "shadow parliament". The CEC members might want to take up a specialised field of interest so that we can also have a "shadow shadow cabinet".

This way voters can be assured that if they vote out a GRC (which is normally led by a Minister), there will still be capable opposition which could replace the ruling party members.
AnnA  -  Other than PAP    Tue, 01 Jul 2008 10:06 am
I will definitely vote for another political party whoever is running the campaign for election in my area!!

Mr Chee Soon Juan's Singapore Democratic Party and Mr JB Jeya's Reform Party will win the hearts of many Singaporeans who are looking forward for a change!! A GREAT CHANGE!!

Looking forward on the day where my aim in life will not be difficult to reach!

Yes you guys have better start preparing else PAP make the election earlier to make us harder to make a choice! I'm quite worried about that as it used to happened many years ago... So please prepare as soon as possible!!
AnnA  -  No Offence Dr Chee    Tue, 01 Jul 2008 10:42 am
I hope you will not be offended whenever I've mentioned SDP, I will also include RP. Surely I am going to vote any one of you that is fighting against PAP in my area.

So, please don't be taken aback as I am looking forward for changes in policies and the ruling systems of Singapore. YES, a whole lot of things to be address!

Any one party will do good to have a seat in Parliament in each constituencies etc. I sincerely hope that the next election will make PAP totally out of power but they still have supporters. I wonder what will happened if LHL lost his seat!! Will he have to quit as PM? He will have to, right? So, do put a strong candidate against him. Start taking care of the citizens who are under his watch. I'm sure he is not very popular among Singaporeans.
g_e  -  It's my party and I'll cry if I want to.    Tue, 01 Jul 2008 2:09 pm
Let's not forget that this was supposed to be a gathering of delegates for International Water Week. By some mysterious mechanism, water magically became a platform for the old man to once more mount his tired old nobody-does-it-better hobby-horse. The SDP, to its credit, is far too well-mannered and polite to explicitly point out the obvious but some of us are far less charitable. Why call a spade a shovel when you can call it a a manual earth-restructuring implement?

A delegate from a country not best renowned for the quality of its leadership inexplicably primes the pump and our oracle gushes forth his well-rehearsed rhetoric for a good half hour. It's a minor miracle he manages to refrain from dark threats of a miltary coup should there be a 'freak' result. What any of what he said has to do with the subject of water (unless he's taking the piss) heaven only knows. A cynic might well think the entire affair was stage-managed, and he would be right.

The mocking lyrics of Carly Simon's song spring unbidden to mind:

You're so vain
You probably think Singapore is about you
You're so vain
I'll bet you think this nation is about you
Don't you? Don't you?
Me  -     Tue, 01 Jul 2008 2:21 pm
"At the end of the day, the PAP is still Lee Kuan Yew and Lee Kuan Yew is still the PAP. His/its modus operandi is to continue to instill fear in the populace and then extract wealth from it. Does all this sound like a party of the future?"

Sounds more like a Mafia gang leader to me. A party of these gangster-type ministers will surely ruin our future! They are good carbon-copies of their mentor master.
Daniel  -     Tue, 01 Jul 2008 3:05 pm
Alamak, Mr Chee you must have forgotten to say in this article that the Chees' family or the Singapore Desperate Party will rule Singapore after LKY is "absent". Anyway, as far as I am still living in Singapore, you can wait long long. If you are allowed to rule, this tiny island will become lawless. Do you know why? Very simple, you always broke so called "unjust" law and once you ever rule (still have to wait long long over my dead body, you will set a new "lawless" law which I believe only favour your own kakis and not Singaporeans.
super mega coward SPH  -  expect the expected    Tue, 01 Jul 2008 4:22 pm
Aiyah as always the Lees always come up with some story agenda that only they the gods can rule Stinkapore and no one else!

Anyone else are:

cheats, liars, womanisers, gamblers, murderers, smugglers, uneducated or kena sacked by the employer for stealing while they are as clean as WKS!

So remember to expect the expected with the Lee Junta and the super mega coward SPH - you will never go wrong!
one more singh  -  The Chees-Lees side of tings    Tue, 01 Jul 2008 4:29 pm
wat crap, i tell u whats my opinion on the Singapore system:

PAP is bad, BUT, opposition are worse..
Alternatively, YES, opposition are good, but PAP is better, given its credibility n experience..

tink POSB vs Citi Private Bank..
where would u prefer to park your assets?

Remember, power corrupts, who can guarantee that should opposition gains control, our dear dear sweet sweet busty CSC will not become Temasek Holdings chairman?
Duh, she knows anything about Corporate Finance? Management Accounting?
Anonymous  -     Tue, 01 Jul 2008 4:46 pm
Has the old man become senile?

First, he admits that without those several million dollar salaries, those he has placed to succeed him wouldn't want to "serve", all because they wouldn't "sacrifice" more than the 10 or so percent more pay they presumably could get elsewhere.

Then he says those very persons would be dependable never to quit whatever the cost, for the sake of Singapore.

But they wouldn't even start to serve without being guaranteed that limit to the 'sacrifice' they would make. You mean we could depend on them to stay, not only minus that, but to give up their lives?

Then he can't see that whatever their presumed shortcomings, those on the uphill task in the opposition might be those few new generation Singaporeans who still have the values and sacrificial spirit of the "old guards" to serve without considering personal well-being for themselves and their families. Indeed, they seem to be doing better, as, unlike for the "old guards", they must know there can be little promise of success and almost certain punishment for them.

I should say that a clearly non-psychotic Lee would try to find successors among such. Ability, epecially in publish service, cannot be separated from commitment. And there can be nothing like partial commitment, especially in public service - "no man can serve two masters", "you cannot serve God and also money".

Lee lamented that conditions today do not throw up the sort of commitment the "old guards" had, who experienced the Japanese.

Well, there are the similarly committed among us, if he isn't blinded by senility to perceive. And they could have been thrown up under the somewhat Japanese-like conditions Lee had put in place!
gary teoh  -     Tue, 01 Jul 2008 6:01 pm
I will support whoever is opposed to pap, be it WP, SDA, SPP, SDP, RP, NSP ,slipper man,independent,this coming GE, dont let them walkover during nomination day,expect 100% contest.Bloggers will definitely contest.
Mike  -  Things going out of hand    Tue, 01 Jul 2008 6:39 pm
By the way things are going,

The people are going to suffer a lot..

Yes, a lot of people are well off

But a lot more Singaporeans have become what is called 'poor people'

Low income and poor people are not well taken care of.. and little is done.

You really cannot survive in Singapore without some education and useful skills.. and work till you collapse and die, young or old.

Else, you are without a house and live as a sub-human here.

Singapore is no longer the home for people who are poor and destitute..

Even if you are born here means nothing anymore...

Prices are up and up..

Even HDB flats prices are going up and up...

How to live and eat without stress?

If you lose your job, you are going to sleep in the streets of Singapore...

But even the streets are not free..
Anonymous  -     Tue, 01 Jul 2008 6:53 pm
Quote:
tink POSB vs Citi Private Bank..
where would u prefer to park your assets?


Of course in Citi, buddy. POSB is thing of the past. Even Singapore GICs put YOUR money in CITI, me too...

Similarly, how about thinking of putting your balot to the in thing SDP!
Anonymous  -     Tue, 01 Jul 2008 7:59 pm
Quote:
Anonymous - Tue, 01 Jul 2008 6:53 pm

Quote:
tink POSB vs Citi Private Bank..
where would u prefer to park your assets?



Of course in Citi, buddy. POSB is thing of the past. Even Singapore GICs put YOUR money in CITI, me too...

Similarly, how about thinking of putting your balot to the in thing SDP!



Bravo!

Park here, park there, park anywhere you like, dude.

But as long as you're holding that little Red ID card, there's no way you're gonna park whatever peanuts you have but with the PAP Government of Singapore.

Yea, Truth hurts, I know, but sorry, Truth is Truth. Always will be.

Tough luck being Singaporean, huh? But it's "the luck of the draw", as your MM used to say back when he was your SM, after having been your PM.

First a P, then an S, now an M - looks like he's gonna stick around a while yet, having exhausted but three letters of the alphabet.

Tough luck, dude.
Anonymous  -  From one ruler to another    Tue, 01 Jul 2008 8:03 pm
Quote:
those on the uphill task in the opposition might be those few new generation Singaporeans who still have the values and sacrificial spirit of the "old guards" to serve without considering personal well-being for themselves and their families. Indeed, they seem to be doing better, as, unlike for the "old guards", they must know there can be little promise of success and almost certain punishment for them.



Frankly I don't care if the next set of rulers are going to enrich themselves or not. Just as long as they aren't from the PAP.

After 43 years, I just want CHANGE!
Write comment
Name:
Email:
Website:
Title:
UBBCode:
[b] [i] [u] [url] [quote] [code] [img] 
 
Please input the anti-spam code that you can read in the image.

3.26 Copyright (C) 2008 Compojoom.com / Copyright (C) 2007 Alain Georgette / Copyright (C) 2006 Frantisek Hliva. All rights reserved."

 

Donate to Legal Defence Fund

 

Vantage

Riding out the financial crisis

Chia Ti Lik

Year 2008 is a year of change, of forced consolidation and rebirth.

Out of university in 1998, I entered the workforce in 1999 fresh with memories of having to work part-time throughout my practice law course. The economy was still feeling the effects of the Asian financial crisis.

Read more
 
The quicksand of Sands

Singapore Democrats

Just weeks after the Singapore authorities gave an upbeat report that the Integrated Resort Casino will create thousands of jobs, developer Las Vegas Sands (or as some wit cracked, Lost Wages Sands) reported that it is haemorrhaging cash and will likely file for bankruptcy.

Read more
 

People's Power

Banner
Banner
Joomla Templates by JoomlaShack