"I think we better leave this place now before pictures of us appear in the Straits Times tomorrow," the man in his 40s told the rest of the group of about ten bystanders in Tamil as he quickly made his exit down the escalator leading to the Clarke Quay MRT station.
He was obviously referring to a photographer from the newspaper who was inching his way closer to the group with his zoom lens trained on them.
The group was engaged in an animated conversation at the Speakers' Corner, expecting to hear a talk on the use of Tamil in public signs.
The event that was publicized through SMS messages was to have started at 6.00 pm yesterday. But the police stopped it at the last minute when they refused to give a licence to the organizer under the Public Entertainment and Meetings Act.
Despite the cancellation, close to fifty people at different times turned up hoping to see and hear firsthand what was happening there.
Except for a couple of local reporters, one from the Straits Times and the other from MediaCorp, and an equal number of activists, none dared to step on the grass field. Most were seen seated in small groups on the benches dotting the footpath of the Park, engaged in the common topic of the status of the Tamil language in Singapore.
The Tamil language issue was chosen for airing by a real estate agent and his ten friends after the government said it was relaxing rules at the speakers' corner from the 1st of this month.
The organizer was peeved by the exclusion of Tamil on the signages at Changi Airport and directional signboards all over the island.
As part of the relaxation, the government said the National Parks Board (NParks) and not the police will handle all applications from people to speak or demonstrate at the Speakers' Corner.
Since his permit was not approved, the organizer was not around at the park yesterday.
A group of five youths who said they were students from the National University of Singapore (NUS) came not knowing that the cancellation of the event was already reported in the papers.
One of them, after reading the newspaper report commented: "Why ban it? Language is nothing to do with race or religion, the taboo subjects that cannot be raised at Speakers' Corner."
"So it is not NParks that approves and it's still the police. What a joke!" another student quipped.
Sitting on one of the benches with three of his friends in another corner of the park, a man in his 60s was speaking passionately about the issue.
He said: "I kept contacting the leading personalities in the Tamil language and literary circles since this morning for their stand on the issue. They kept pushing me from one to the other. None was prepared to have an opinion on the issue,"the man said in disgust.
"Even the Indian leaders in the PAP are afraid to raise this issue," added his friend.
In the meanwhile, those who have read about the cancellation and others who had not seen it strolled into the Park only to be told of the denial of permit by the few who remained there.
At about 9.00 pm, a man in his 50s with his family, including two teenage children, walked in but soon left disappointed. The Speakers' Corner managed yet again to retain serenity and quiet.
You see lah, the government goin back on its words again. Hey, those of you who do not understand why we complain about government, this is precisely why. One minute say like this, next minute another thing. SDP said it already; wayang to fool S'poreans.
Sun 21 Sep 2008 5:57 AM
|
Anonymous
As expected, PAP's wayang. Another 40 years of PAP& Lee rule. LOL ;-)
Just face it, Singapore stinks & sinks.
Sun 21 Sep 2008 7:59 AM|
|
NOT MY SDP - Appeal to SDP to not toy with racial issues
The main point is that SDP is playing a dangerous game by toying with sensitive racial issues. A political party should act responsibly and refrain from stoking or fanning racial tensions. Its report on the matter is uncalled for and is sensationalised with strong emotions. Such a report should not be dismissed as a possible spark to racial conflicts.
We hereby hope that SDP remove the article "Spectators cornered at Speakers' Corner" immediately.
Sun 21 Sep 2008 9:02 AM
|
ah beng - a racial issue
It was meant to be a discussion on the lack of signages in Tamil.Languages are nothing racial. If the government lets in foreign workers from India, then it should assists them with signs in Tamil at the airport since most of them arrive there. Or is the government saying they came by boats? And by banning these people from speaking, the government is doing exactly what they said we shouldn't. By banning, the government has acted against the Tamil community, which is a race issue. Didn't PM Lee said that issues on race and religion are not to be touched on at Speaker's Corner? Hey S'pore government, who did you say is trying to do you in?
Sun 21 Sep 2008 6:39 PM|
|
seebeng - Reply to Not My SDP
Tamil is one of the four official languages of Singapore. Since attempts are made to remove Tamil from signages, it is certainly a move aimed at hurting the feelings of a particular community whose rights are guaranteed in the Constitution.
So, the PAP govt should first refrain from stoking or fanning racial tensions to antogonize a section of our community.
The perpetrator of this "tension" is none other than the PAP govt.
Mon 22 Sep 2008 10:43 AM
|
Poochai - perplex
If they can have signboards in Thai why not in Tamil. Check it out in the Changi Budget Terminal.
Is Thai one of Singapore official languages. LOL.
Mon 22 Sep 2008 11:55 AM
|
Anonymous
why tamil... why not any of the other indian languages like hindi.
is it because most of the indians here are tamil... then most of the people here are chinese so shouldnt all signs be in chinese
Mon 22 Sep 2008 12:18 PM
|
tohjohn
.
Classic signs of an authoritarian regime --- paranoia. They are scare of everything. Anything is a potential threat/issue to distrupt their rule and authority.
The apex of this paranoia symptom is the old man himself - LKY. Clinging on to power till his twilight age.
Sounds familiar doesn't it? Way way back in history tyrans and despots were inflicted by such symptom esp. by an aging leader in his final years/months/weeks/days.
Imagine, even a protest about a language taken off from the sign posts or notice boards at the airport is a threat!?!? And a racial threat to boot!?!?.
Can you just beat that?
Funny but sad, isn't it?
.
Mon 22 Sep 2008 2:10 PM
|
Methink - "We" - You and your PAP master?
Hi Not My SDP,
You are speaking for someone else? Who is the "We"? Your PAP masters?
'We hereby hope that SDP remove the article "Spectators cornered at Speakers' Corner" immediately.'
Mon 22 Sep 2008 4:19 PM
|
Tan Tai Wei
What I find contradictory is that something so potentially racially sensitive, especially in the wake of recent Indian protests in Malaysia, should be done by the very leadership that in banning the protest at Hong Lim Park seems so concerned that it could spark racist unrest.
If having Japanese notices at the airport is needed, just add them on. If the signboards lack space, redesign the notices to fit in the Japanese.
In any case, however troublesome or costly, you don't replace the Tamil notices and risk hurting Indian sensitivities.
"If they can have signboards in Thai why not in Tamil. Check it out in the Changi Budget Terminal.
Is Thai one of Singapore official languages. LOL."
If this is the case then our Tamil brothers and sisters are truly marginalized (excluded or ignored). It is only right that they speak out loud and clear. It is their "right" to demand a similar level of service (signboards in MRT is one of them)as the other main races in Singapore.
Thai and Japanese are only tourists in transit and the MRT, which is indirectly linked to the government needs to know the sensitivity of the issue and pay the due respect to the Tamil community.
It is now time for the Tamil to follow the leads of their Malaysian counterparts...yea protest in the Speakers' Corner. The protest message is neutral: "Equal treatments for all Singaporeans" or "Learn Tamil to understand your fellow Singaporeans better". If the PAPee can have "Speak Mandarin" and "Speak Goody English campaigns, why not the Tamil have similar "campaigns ti promote social understandings.
Have a "protest" once a month on the first Sunday afternoon at 5:30 pm in the Speakers Corner and if it rains then by default it will move to the 2nd Sunday of the month. Get the "Bollywood" type of singing and dance to kick of each session then get two or three powerful Tamil speaker to teach some Chinese audience to speak Tamil in a humourous way through song and dance. But always end with the message that Tamil signs must be put up in most government or semi govt serives (like MRT, Changi airport, army base) etc.
Tue 23 Sep 2008 2:05 AM
|
Making a mockery of people - Fools paradize
[quote][b]So it is not NParks that approves and it's still the police. What a joke!" another student quipped.[/b][/quote]
[color=red][color=black]One big waying by LHL - waste of ND speech??????[/color][/color]
Tue 23 Sep 2008 2:08 AM
|
All for monies sake - No values
[quote][b]"Even the Indian leaders in the PAP are afraid to raise this issue," added his friend.[/b][/quote]
[color=blue][b]SAd state of affairs in the Papyess- all holding office for the sake of big fat salaries not for the sake of values or convictions of what honest values?????[/b][/color]
Tue 23 Sep 2008 2:11 AM
|
A very good quote - Please wake up
[quote][b]The city-state has four official languages -- English, Chinese, Malay and Tamil -- to accommodate its multiethnic population, which is majority Chinese with sizeable Malay and Indian minorities.
In recent years, however, multilingual signs have mushroomed at Changi international airport and at tourist hotspots bearing only three of those four languages plus Japanese, [u]with Tamil not among them[/u][/b][/quote]
http://www.singaporeindianvoice.blogspot.com/
Tue 23 Sep 2008 2:14 AM
|
PAP sleeping Leaders Answer - Better close down Speakers Corner
[quote][b[color=red]]"All this doesn't make sense. It's a mistake. They are trying to attract more Japanese by using Japanese language for the signboards.
But as Singapore Tamil speakers, we have a slight feeling of 'unwantedness' creeping into us," [/color][/b][/quote]
[b]Where is the Singaporean Spirit of mulitracialism?????????[/b]
Tue 23 Sep 2008 2:34 AM
|
Must be paid souble salary - Very well said
[quote][b]May I remind readers that Changi Airport is managed by the Civil Aviation Authority of Singapore (CAAS), which is a statutory board under the Ministry of Transport, and is funded by taxpayer’s money.[/b][/quote]-BY
An[color=red][b] article by my fellow socio-political blogger Ng E-Jay.
very very well said Mr Ng E-Jay - Salute to you!
You should be paid double the Papyee Leader's salary!![/b][/color]
Tue 23 Sep 2008 6:06 AM
|
Poochai - Reply to Not My SDP
If discussion on lack of Tamil signages are racial issue in which Tamil is one of the four Singapore official languages - isn't omitting them racial too ?
Sweep under the carpet again.
Tue 23 Sep 2008 6:20 AM
|
Poochai - Reply to Anonymous
[code]why tamil... why not any of the other indian languages like hindi.
is it because most of the indians here are tamil... then most of the people here are chinese so shouldnt all signs be in chinese[/code]
Why not if hindi is the official language.
You said "most" but you want "all".....LOL.
Tue 23 Sep 2008 8:46 AM
|
Tan Tai Wei
It could be that the removal of Tamil notices was done by authorities lower down, who lacked the 'helicopter view' and decided based upon pure utility and 'cost effectiveness', without also seeing the socio-political picture.
But then, since what they should have been sentitive to seemed to actualise, and Indians seemed to be agitated, the last minute stopping of the Hong Lim protest must have come from the top leadership, who must have been alerted on such a potentially grave issue.
However, what top leadership it was to just impose the ban, and doing nothing else!
A mistake had been made at replacing the Tamil signs, for which government must take responsibility, however the decision to do so had been made. Then, at the first attempt by those affected to voice unhappiness, down came the clamp to snuff it out, without even a word accompanying.
Isn't it like a tynnical father I saw once, who lashed his son brutally, and then lashed again, when he dared to yell in pain?
Precisely because it was a racially sensitive issue that had already been ignited, the 'no nonsense' manner in which the grievance was snuffed out would only add salt to the wound.
An explanation and apology for the oversight, with a hasty putting back the Tamil notices, whilst withholding permit for the Hong Lim protest because no longer needed, would be the discretionary thing to do.
Tue 23 Sep 2008 12:11 PM|
|
seebeng - It has been simmering
Mr Tan,
What I understand from my Indian friends, this has been a simmering issue for sometime now with the authorities fully aware of. The removal of Tamil has its tacit approval of the bigwigs, hence the total silence from the PAP through its newspapers, including the Tamil daily owned by SPH.
Tue 23 Sep 2008 4:36 PM
|
AnnA - I Am Against Racism
Alamak... just see our National Language being put on the 3rd row automatically on signboards throughout Singapore... and nobody say anything.. how to stand for this? We already know since long time who are the racist chaps....
It is a good thing that this matter is brought forward so that 'they' know people are noticing.
Tue 23 Sep 2008 4:58 PM
|
Tan Tai Wei
Thanks, Seebeng,
Assuming your Indian friends are right, then it calls for further thinking.
The government can't be deliberately discriminating insensitively and unfairly against Indians. We all can surely take this for granted.
So, maybe this is the thinking behind the removal of Tamil.
Whilst the four official languages are used in detailed government circulars and letters, short and simple notices such as road signs are all only in english, because it has been the common language, and the first language of education and business, and all can understand, or learn to do so, the short and simple signs, like 'no littering, fine $500', or 'no right turn'.
However, in places where visitors to our nation frequent, like the airport and tourist attractions, other languages are also used for more detailed notices, which languages depending on what nationals are expected to visit the places. This explains why Thai or Japanese notices appear in some places, as some postings above pointed out.
Why not also Tamil at the airport and some other places, as Indian FTs have been coming in aplenty? Don't know; perhaps they come in not in numbers deemed sufficient to warrant it? Or an oversight?
Will the real authorities please tell us the official reason, and don't let us grope?
Wed 24 Sep 2008 12:52 PM
|
Sivakumar
seebeng - Reply to Not My SDP
Hope you're not an Indian.If yes, you are playing with fire. Maybe you want Singaporean Indians to follow the steps of the Malaysian Indians protesting against the govt. Damned you.
Mon 06 Oct 2008 10:48 PM
|
ah beng - Poor sight
Is that what u call speakers corner. Its like public toilet signboard