Singapore Democrats

PAP must take its head out Print Email
Sunday, 12 April 2009

Singapore Democrats

Job losses in Singapore are taking place at breakneck speed but Government leaders seem to be oblivious to the plight of thousands of our workers swelling the army of unemployed.

There have been more than 10,000 layoffs in the first three months of this year alone, admitted Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong. He added that the economy could shrink further from the already expected downward spiral of between -2 and -5 percent.

Adding to the growing uncertainty is Mr Lim Swee Say, a minister in the Prime Minister's Office (PMO) and secretary-general of NTUC, who said recently that "there could be a second wave of retrenchment coming on board" and that "it was anybody's guess" what the retrenchment figures would be.


Mr Lim is paid $2.5 million a year for telling us it is "anybody's guess" how many people would get retrenched. Anybody could have made this guess.

The PAP government boasts having recruited the cream of society into its ranks with ministers extraordinarily gifted to foresee "storm clouds or crises" appearing on the horizon twenty to thirty years ahead.

And yet the same team of the highest paid politicians in the world cannot find solutions to the current economic meltdown and is reduced to simply waiting for the US economy to pick up so that we can start selling to the Americans again.

If this is the case why are the self-proclaimed high-caliber ministers continuing to act like they are God's gift to Singapore?

Ideas anyone?

As the days go by, it is becoming clearer and clearer that the present crisis is mainly due to the PAP administration committing the country's economic activity to one of contract manufacturing for the US and European markets. For more than four decades the export-driven, parts-manufacturing economy has been on autopilot.

But now that the Western economies have tanked, what is the PAP prescribing for our ailing economy?

Besides the Government and Temasek-linked companies dominating the local scene, more than 70 percent of the manufacturing sector is in the hands of foreign multi-national corporations (MNCs) with most of the activity concentrated in low-end technology with hardly any high-tech research and development.

With its control of everything in Singapore, including the social, cultural, political and economic spheres, the PAP Government has alienated the people from the state, resulting in droves of Singaporeans emigrating.

Every year 1,000 Singaporeans renounce their citizenship. Horrendous as this figure is, it doesn't tell the whole story. Every month more than 1,000 Singaporeans seek permanent residency in another country. And with them go the skills that Singapore would do well to retain.

But the PAP's solution is to let cheap labour from Third World countries flood society so as to suppress wages in order to keep up the pretense that we are still a profitable economy. Of the new jobs that are created, a majority goes to foreign workers.

More than one million of the 4.8 million people in this country are foreigners. But the Government has paid scant regard to the economic and social implications from such sudden and massive influx of foreigners.

Are there no other solutions? Why can't the authorities look into the reasons for the exodus of Singaporeans out of the country? Why can't we stimulate creativity and entrepreneurship by allowing the people freedom instead of choking the life out of them with the dictatorial system?

Heck, why are the ministers making themselves millionaires when they can't lead?

And why keep stuffing the cabinet with more ministers -- from 18 to 21-- while the economy is hemorrhaging?

One way out of this present economic nightmare is to free Singapore and let the people take the lead. There is much potential that is being killed by the PAP's unbending, authoritarian rule.

Reforming the system to allow alternative views and ideas to flourish is imperative. One-party rule in this modern era is not the way forward.

 

Share this article:
Facebook Technorati Stumble It! Newsvine Reddit Del.icio.us Digg This!
Comments (10)
  • quantum
    http://www.straitstimes.com/Breaking%2BNews/Singapore/Story/STIStory_362778.html

    April 12, 2009
    'We use the best people'
    By Li Xueying
    SINGAPORE is a meritocracy that does not distinguish between old or new citizens, said Minister Mentor Lee Kuan Yew.

    Whether it comes to the giving out of jobs or business contracts or scholarships, whoever excels will be rewarded, he stressed on Sunday.

    Mr Lee was addressing about 450 people - two-thirds of whom are new citizens and permanent residents - at the launch of a new feature section in Chinese-language newspaper Lianhe Zaobao.

    Called Crossroads, it is aimed at new immigrants, and will feature news and issues that concern them.

    Speaking in Mandarin, Mr Lee, who attended the event as a special guest, said the most important principle of meritocracy is: all citizens are equal.

    'There is no difference between races, religions, new or old citizens,' he said.

    'Our policy is: whatever your background or race, we use the best people. So, I think, those who choose to emigrate to Singapore, you do so because you understand Singapore does not require guanxi (connections)...They know Singapore's governance is open, transparent and fair.'

    However, this also means the immigrants must master English, he cautioned.

    'If you want to succeed in Singapore, you need to have a good grasp of English - our common language,' he said. 'So when you communicate with the world or among races, there is no advantage whether you are Malay, Indian, or Chinese.

    'Thus, the competition is very fair.'

    During his 30-minute session, which included a question-and-answer segment with the audience, Mr Lee also addressed the concern that many new immigrants use Singapore as a stepping stone to other countries. Last year, 20,513 foreigners took up citizenship, while 79,167 took up permanent residency.

    With this uptick in numbers come concerns about societal tensions, as Singaporeans grapple with issues ranging from foreign worker housing to competition in schools, hospitals or the property market.

    While acknowledging this, Mr Lee also said that the faster the new immigrants meld into society, the better for the society and economy.
  • seebeng - verbal diarrhea
    As usual Lau Lee is spewing forth incoherent babble, and at the same time telling us that he is still in charge of things in Singapore.

    What LKY practices is LEEtocracy and not meritocracy.

    It's time we stood up against the Lee dictatorship.
  • Robox
    Re: [color=red]"...what is the PAP prescribing for our ailing economy?"[/color]

    More of the same: grin and bear it.

    This bad wind will pass, and good times will be upon us in no time.

    All that needs to happen is for the villain US economy to recover. Then, the same US economy that will lift up the Singapore economy when it does recover will not be credited for the reason that good times have returned; instead, it is the ever virtuous and super talented PAP that would be credited for it.

    But will the very [i]nature[/i] of the overly export-oriented Singapore economy change so that Singaporeans will never again experience these wild fluctuations (in both directions)?

    Never!

    Fixing the economy is not a priority for the PAP; instead they spend all their free time devising ways to criminalize Singaporeans who have important contributions to make.

    Singaporeans like reformist politicians.

    And speaking of wild fluctuations - which incidentally are not being experienced in the well planned economies that have a sense of balance - isn't it funny that it is only the PAP that is exempt from experiencing those fluctuations they subject Singaporeans to by virtue of their ever increasing salaries?
  • Robox
    Re: [color=red]"But the PAP's solution is to let cheap labour from Third World countries flood society so as to suppress wages in order to keep up the pretense that we are still a profitable economy."[/color]

    But suppressing incomes is a PAP strategy reserved only for the non-civil service sectors where foreigners are allowed to work.

    Because of the widespread fear, especially among civil servants, that our vote is not a secret, civil service employees are an assured vote bank for the PAP.

    As such, it would be an important economic pseudo-strategy to keep civil service salaries intact to be assured of being returned to power. This would be especially useful in an economic downturn.

    How else can those civil service employees be expected to continue lying in court, or refusing to mete out justice by rigging all the rules of fair trials for defendants in politically-motivated cases?

    At about the same time that the PAP was persuading Singaporeans to accept the foreign talent policy, we were also being warned of an impending 'digital divide' that was about to set in and which would result in a disparity in incomes among Singaporeans.

    That so-called digital divide is indeed here except that there is nothing very digital in its nature; it's purely political in nature.

    The PAP charades are up.
  • Seelan Palay
    Good article with lots of bite!
  • Low Fuk Loong - SDP is very focus on relevant ground issues, good
    SDP is very focus on relevant issues and not distracted by the speak mandarin campaign , reach out to FTs, and other nonsense.

    Many readers share the same sentiment that SDP has improved so very much. This is the street sentiment not only my opinion.

    So what we do is that we tell people in the streets to read SDP website to get a better picture of singapore.

    SDP website is also children friendly, every child that can read should also read SDP website becos in school, they read a lot about PAP - thats no good to their brain and bad for development.

    Amid the recession,we keep hearing what speak mandarin campaign (TV shows a Angmoh girl in china accent, how come not a malay girl huh?), go native with new immigrants, etc. Who is talking man ????

    Fair society? Hahahahaha, laugh dead people !
    How many first-generation new immigrants never serve NS, don the sweaty green , feed mosquitoes at mandai, go RT, kenna left right center, sometimes verbal assault on father and mother who are docile enough to send us to mindef ????

    dont talk cock, show us the non-serving FT -citizen figure in the headlines , you dare or not ???
  • quantum
    http://news.asiaone.com/print/News/the%2BStraits%2BTimes/Story/A1Story20090413-134891.html

    Thank you, Mr Lee, say new immigrants

    They pay tribute to him for the many chances S'pore has given them. -ST

    Mon, Apr 13, 2009
    The Straits Times

    [Photo: Minister Mentor Mr Lee Kuan Yew is met with applause as he arrives at the Lianhe Zaobao launch of a new feature section, Crossroads, which targets new immigrants in Singapore.]

    By Li Xueying, Political Correspondent

    ONE by one, they stood to thank Minister Mentor Lee Kuan Yew for his governance of a country that has given them so many opportunities.

    The youngest was 20-year-old Lin Shuang, formerly from Sichuan, who completed her A levels at Temasek Junior College and has received many offers from universities in Britain and Hong Kong.

    The oldest was 92-year-old Teh Wan Boon from Malaysia, who emigrated to Singapore when he was 86 because of the 'good security' here.
  • quantum
    http://www.straitstimes.com/print/Breaking%2BNews/Singapore/Story/STIStory_363047.html

    April 13, 2009
    Chief Justice reappointed
    MR CHAN Sek Keong has been reappointed Chief Justice, the Prime Minister's Office said on Monday.

    'The President, acting in his discretion, and in concurrence with the advice of the Prime Minister, has re-appointed Mr Chan Sek Keong as the Chief Justice from April 11 2009 to Nov 5 2012, when he will be 75 years of age,' said a PMO statement.

    Mr Chan was first appointed Chief Justice on Arpil 11, 2006.

    The President has also reappointed CJ Chan as Chairman of the Presidential Council for Minority Rights for a further term of three years, from April 11.
  • vincesdp - Shameless
    There is a difference between being a disgrace and being shameless. Shameless people do not feel bad about being disgraceful and that is what the PAP are.
  • Tikam Tikam Girl - Waste of Resources
    It will take lots of time and effort to put together all the data to show PAP is wasting hugh amount of the people's resources. No need. Intuitively the people know already what a waster the PAP has been.
Please login or register to post your comments.
 

Announcements

Event re-scheduled to 2 June 2012 (Sat)!
More details

 

Latest Videos

Chee Soon Juan's speech at the Oslo Freedom Forum
You need a Flash Player enabled browser to view this YouTube video
youtube
link

Speeches at SDP's May Day Rally 2012
You need a Flash Player enabled browser to view this YouTube video
youtube link

GE2011 - One Year On
You need a Flash Player enabled browser to view this YouTube video
youtube Link

Highlight of SDP's May Day Rally 2012
You need a Flash Player enabled browser to view this YouTube video
youtube Link

 

Act Now

Please Donate
More options to donate
 

The SDP National Healthcare Plan

SDP Publictaions

Magazine Support SDP , buy our 30th Anniversary Magazine here


                        pdf link

minsal
pdf
link

 

Danny the Democracy Bear

Now available online here!

 
Banner
Banner

Awesome Words

Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.

Martin Luther King Jr.

News feeds

Singapore Democrat News
Joomla Templates by JoomlaShack